Professionals warned on traps of certain unit trusts

Written by Miranda Brownlee Monday, 21 March 2016

SMSF practitioners and auditors have been told to carefully review the legal documents associated with their clients' 50-50 unit trust structures, as some professionals are in danger of attracting the attention of the regulator through the provision of potentially negligent advice in this area.

Speaking at a seminar in Sydney, DBA Lawyers director Daniel Butler said while practitioners or auditors may not be constructing the constitution and documents of a unit trust themselves, by recommending a unit trust strategy and putting forward particular documents for the client to use, they need to be aware they are implicitly stating to the client that the documents are fit for purpose.

Mr Butler explained a 50-50 unit trust involves two separate SMSFs each holding a 50 per cent unit holding in a trust. This trust may be used to hold property and other investments.

The ATO confirmed in 2013, he said, that a 50-50 unitholding arrangement would not give rise to a related trust arrangement.

“It should be noted, however, that the ATO has broad powers and unless this type of 50 per cent/50 per cent arrangement is carefully implemented and documented, it could result in a contravention of SISA with significant penalties,” he warned.

Mr Butler said there are various traps with this strategy which are in some cases catching out practitioners.

If the constitution of the corporate trustee for the trust, for instance, provides a casting vote to a chairperson, this can give rise to a related trust relationship.

“For this reason, it is generally much safer to have, for example, three unrelated SMSFs undertaking such an investment with, say with 33.3 per cent units each. This would not give rise to a related trust relationship,” he said.

Mr Butler said he also saw another case where an adviser had set up a unit trust with a number of siblings in the same unit trust which they used to complete a development.

“The adviser made the call that it was not a related party trust, which was purely negligent advice,” he said.

“The adviser then ducked for cover and avoided dealing with the client’s issue. I’m now involved in the process of trying to get compensation for the client.”

"We’re seeing advisers who think they know what they’re doing [with these structures] and clients who just don’t know what to question.”

Mr Butler said this is also an issue for auditors who should be having a “deep look under the hood of these trusts during an audit”.

Auditors he said may be assuming too much risk and signing off on poorly constructed documents.

“Auditors may want to insist on a legal opinion that the 50-50 structure is straight down the line rather than one of the ones with a swinging constitution,” he said.

Read more:

Accurium eyes expansion in education space

Accounting network sceptical of gender discrimination report

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Comments   

 
+2 #1 SMSFCoach 2016-03-22 09:53
Any decent adviser needs to know when to bring in the experts. I know clients want to save on costs but you have to look at the big picture. I know for LRBAs I could get documents cheap but I insist clients use Townsends who I am comfortable with or the likes of DBA Butler whne huge sums are at stake.

With unrelated party trust developments you are lookign at 20%+ profits in a lot of cases so the stakes are high.

I want to see a letter of advice from the lawyers to the clients stating that the documents are fit for purpose and that I am not the one who is claiming that. Our job as advisers is often to guide clients to the appropriate specialist not to try and be a master of everything.
Quote
 

Straw Poll

Has the budget affected your ability to advise your clients on super
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
Total Votes:
First Vote:
Last Vote:

Latest Columns

Latest Comments

  • ASIC drills in warning to accountants

    Chris you sound like the old planners 20 years ago when FSR first hit and they had to actually put their advice in writing, they too had the mantra ...
    25 May 13:12  
  • Lenders still ‘dialling down’ on LRBAs

    Given the limits on LVRs and liquidity restrictions, the downside risks to LRBAs are limited. Without the benefit of SMSF Loans crystal ball, who's to ...
    24 May 18:11  
  • ASIC drills in warning to accountants

    " joining the club with the investment scammers, the property spruikers, and all of the other people who choose to operate illegally" Yeah, it's great ...
    24 May 12:13