FSC warns government against tampering with super

Written by Staff Reporter Tuesday, 01 March 2016

The Financial Services Council has cautioned the government against tinkering with superannuation, stating that superannuation changes are “not credible tax reform”.

Speaking in Sydney on Friday, FSC chief executive Sally Loane said superannuation must not be "raided" by the government to fill holes in the federal budget or to "fund pet projects".

"The national retirement savings policy – otherwise known as superannuation, has little to do with the tax system," Ms Loane said.

"Everyone knows we have a crook tax system. It is confusing, inefficient, costs Australian investment and jobs, and it reduces the incentives for many to work.

"You can tinker with super, but the truth is you will still have a broken tax system," she said.

Superannuation changes are "not credible tax reform", she added.

"Let’s be very clear: the gates have long been closed to stop people stuffing millions into super," Ms Loane said.

"Super was never designed as an intergenerational wealth transfer vehicle and should not be used as such."

Ms Loane also laid out the FSC's six-point plan for superannuation:

  • give every Australian saver cast-iron confidence in the system;
  • define its purpose and make it law;
  • increase the superannuation guarantee rate to 12 per cent by 2022;
  • encourage people to save voluntarily beyond the 12 per cent guarantee;
  • provide tax concessions which give all Australians an incentive to save;
  • increase the preservation age in line with increases in the age pension and life expectancy.

"If we follow this plan, new analysis by Rice Warner Actuaries demonstrates that the super system will achieve its objective – the present value of our age pension liabilities will be reduced by 60 per cent for middle Australia by 2050," Ms Loane said.

Read more: 

Mid-tier firm finds gaping holes in trustee knowledge

Living expenses biggest barrier to boosting super savings, says MLC

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Comments   

 
0 #3 Leo 2016-03-01 15:50
Totally agree Elaine. I wouldn't trust my employer to get my SG correct, let alone entrust them with the responsibility of salary sacrifice.
Quote
 
 
0 #2 Josh 2016-03-01 14:43
Elaine, I agree completely. Some people, especially lower income workers (even if their spouse is a high income earner) generally work for smaller businesses - which many (or may not) even be making the employees compulsory contributions on time (if at all) - letalone sacrificing additional funds which may not get where it needs to go.
Quote
 
 
+3 #1 Elaine 2016-03-01 11:30
One way to encourage people to save voluntarily beyond the SGC would be to remove the 10% rule, so that people can make ad hoc deductible contributions to super without having to go through their employer.
Quote
 

Straw Poll

Has the budget affected your ability to advise your clients on super
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
Total Votes:
First Vote:
Last Vote:

Latest Columns

Latest Comments

  • ASIC drills in warning to accountants

    Chris you sound like the old planners 20 years ago when FSR first hit and they had to actually put their advice in writing, they too had the mantra ...
    25 May 13:12  
  • Lenders still ‘dialling down’ on LRBAs

    Given the limits on LVRs and liquidity restrictions, the downside risks to LRBAs are limited. Without the benefit of SMSF Loans crystal ball, who's to ...
    24 May 18:11  
  • ASIC drills in warning to accountants

    " joining the club with the investment scammers, the property spruikers, and all of the other people who choose to operate illegally" Yeah, it's great ...
    24 May 12:13