In its submission, SMSFA advocated for the removal of the 10 per cent income test, superannuation contribution age limits, the active member test and the anti-detriment rules from superannuation law.
The submission said the 10 per cent income test or the ‘maximum as an employee’ test prohibits members of superannuation funds from claiming a tax deduction for making a voluntary contribution to their fund if they earn 10 per cent or more of their adjusted income as an employee.
“The alternative for those with 10 per cent of their adjusted income from employment is to use salary sacrifice arrangements with their employer to maximise their concessional contributions,” said SMSFA.
The submission argued employees who cannot access salary sacrifice arrangements through their employer are therefore disadvantaged where they fail the 10 per cent income test.
“We believe that removing the 10 per cent income test would improve the efficiency of the superannuation system and provide greater equity by removing a barrier for Australians who do not have access to salary sacrifice arrangements,” said SMSFA.
The submission also said the current rules regarding the non-concessional contribution bring-forward rule discriminates against workers aged over 65 who are still saving for their retirement and are potentially in a ‘catch-up phase’ in their savings life cycle.
“With more workers continuing to work longer to fund their retirement, it would be sensible to remove the age barriers to using the non-concessional contribution bring-forward rule,” said SMSFA.
SMSFA chief executive Andrea Slattery said it is “imperative to give more opportunity for people to make contributions, especially later in life, to ensure adequate superannuation balances to provide for their retirement”.
"We want to see a recommitment to the long-term goals of superannuation, and in particular a focus on providing retirement income via the three-pillar system of the age pension, compulsory contributions and voluntary contributions."
The submission also proposed excluding the ‘active member’ test from the requirement for any superannuation fund to qualify for taxation concessions under the income tax law.
“Residency of the fund should be determined on the same principals as all other entities for income tax purposes, that is, the place of establishment and the location of the management and control of the entity.”
SMSFA also argued that the anti-detriment rules were “effectively a legacy item from the changes to superannuation taxation in 1988” and suggested they be removed.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
28 Jun 2016Govt told to rethink super policy in light of BrexitBy Staff Reporter
28 Jun 2016Looming election ‘heads I lose, tails I lose’ for SMSFsBy Katarina Taurian
28 Jun 2016Post-Brexit ‘definitely time for caution’By Katarina Taurian
28 Jun 2016Financial services provider to launch SMSF admin, investment platformBy Staff Reporter
27 Jun 2016ASIC tipped to ‘make example’ of accountantsBy Katarina Taurian
27 Jun 2016Brexit to offer SMSFs blue-chip bargainsBy Miranda Brownlee
- view all
Govt told to rethink super policy in light of Brexit
Several investor lobby groups are pushing the government to reconsider its proposed super changes in light of Brexit, given the current and ...read more
Looming election ‘heads I lose, tails I lose’ for SMSFs
One Australian fund manager believes that despite the tough policies the Liberal government announced in the budget, superannuation policy u...read more
Financial services provider to launch SMSF admin, investment platform
A financial services company has opened pre-registrations for its new SMSF platform, set to launch next month, which will provide establishm...read more
- view all